Six Colors
Six Colors

Apple, technology, and other stuff

Support this Site

Become a Six Colors member to read exclusive posts, get our weekly podcast, join our community, and more!

By Dan Moren

Apple hikes prices for Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, Apple News+ and Apple One bundles

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

It takes money to make money: specifically, it takes your money to make money for large corporations. As online services around the world raise their prices, Apple is no exception; today, the company announced higher costs for several of its online services, including Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, Apple News+ and its Apple One bundles. (Prices for Apple Music and Apple Fitness+ remain unchanged.)

New prices for Apple One bundle
New prices for Apple One bundle effective immediately.

MacRumors reports on the details of the price changes, which see each service hiked between $2-3 per month, as well as $3-5 for the Apple One bundles. Those prices are effective today for new subscribers, and for existing customers in 30 days or their next renewal date.

This increase really shouldn’t come as a surprise: Disney+, Hulu, Netflix—almost every major streaming service has raised their prices over the last year. In some cases, this is to compensate for lost revenue from customers canceling cable packages where older more conventional networks and studios used to bring in money for selling their shows. But it’s also a matter of demand: people are hungry for content, and content isn’t cheap.

This is the second price hike for Apple TV+, which debuted at a $4.99 monthly price (free for several months in many cases)—with a rather paltry library of content—before subsequently rising to $6.99 a year ago. Apple’s built up its TV+ content substantially since launch, and the company seems to be making the argument that all of that new material is worth more money. Whether that’s true will, ultimately, be up to the consumer.

I do have to raise an eyebrow at the increased costs for both Apple Arcade and Apple News+. Neither of these services seem to have been blockbuster hits for the company, and perhaps Apple’s decided it’s not just going to make it up in volume. News+ did see some additions this year, including Puzzles and integration with subscriber-only podcasts. But I think both have mainly benefited from being included in the Apple One bundle: I know that if I had my way, I’d gladly trade them both for Apple Fitness+ and a lower overall price, but there’s a reason Apple’s not offering a “build your own bundle” plan.

Let’s also not forget that, of course, Services remains a sector that Apple has bet heavily on as iPhone sales mature and it looks to diversify its business. And given that the company’s deal with Google is under increased scrutiny, Apple would probably like to find a way to offset the possibility of losing that $18-20b, which represents around a quarter of the company’s Services revenue in 2022.

This might also just be the new world order for online services: expect the price raises to increase until morale improves. Or until the churning Thunderdome of competition starts eliminating streamers.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By Jason Snell for Macworld

“Scary fast” looks like an M3 Mac treat

Apple’s got something for us on October 30, but will it be a trick or a treat? If you had asked me a couple of days ago, I would’ve guessed that we’d be seeing a fairly boring set of late-cycle Mac updates announced via press release. But when Apple mailed out announcements for a live video event with the phrase “Scary fast,” my expectations changed in a heartbeat.

It’s hard to interpret Apple’s words (both of them) as meaning anything but the introduction of an impressive new generation of Apple chips. This year’s treat is apparently the M3 processor.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Dan Moren

Spooktacular Apple Event on Halloween Eve

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

Apple scary event

Chalk this one up as something I’ve never seen before: an Apple event in the evening. The company on Tuesday announced a “Scary Fast” event coming Monday, October 30 at 5pm Pacific time.

It’s largely expected that this event will feature new Macs, as reported by Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman this weekend: the money seems to be on a refreshed 24-inch iMac, though other announcements are possible.

Given the late hour, it’s likely this event will be entirely pre-recorded. We’re expecting treats over tricks, but the real question is whether we’ll get a glimpse at Tim Cook’s Halloween costume.1


  1. He’s going as the scariest thing he can think of: a Performa 6300CD. 

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


A single Apple Pencil announcement leads us to think existential thoughts about the iPad product line, and Jason had an idea about a new MacBook Pro in the shower.


Amazon joins the passkey revolution

Passkey adoption seems to be accelerating. The Verge reports Amazon has now joined the ranks of online services that allow you to generate the secure credentials to log in to its site, joining Apple, Google, and a slew of others. You can set up a passkey on the website under Your Account > Login & Security > Passkey, or via the updated version of the iOS app.

I set up a passkey at Amazon and it was a perfectly smooth experience: clicking the Set Up link prompted me to authenticate with Touch ID on my MacBook Air, and that was that. When I tested logging in, I was given the option to enter my password or choose to sign in with a passkey.1

Amazon’s adoption is particularly significant given its prominence in the online sphere. As more big companies of its size move towards passkey authentication, there will be more incentive across the industry to adopt the new security standard. And it certainly seems as though these moves are accelerating. Apple and Google both added support to their web services earlier this year, and of course Apple launched full passkey support in its platforms in 2022.


  1. Slightly oddly, I was still asked to provide my two-factor authentication code after signing in with the passkey, a step that shouldn’t technically be necessary. 

By Dan Moren

Quick Tip: macOS Sonoma/iOS 17’s AutoFill everywhere is a lifesaver

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

One of the interesting things about Apple’s big yearly platform updates is that the features that are big and flashy often aren’t the ones that make the biggest difference.

After several weeks of using the updates, you start to get into a bit of a rhythm, which means figuring out what actually changes the way you use your devices.

For me, one of the best new features of iOS/iPadOS 17 and macOS Sonoma is a small one, squirreled away in a contextual menu: AutoFill.

Of course, AutoFill has been around forever. In Safari, it’s what lets you fill out forms with saved information so you don’t end up typing your address or credit card information a billion times. It also works with your stored passwords, letting you pop those in as well.

But the web is imperfect, and sometimes AutoFill just doesn’t work quite right: fields aren’t correctly defined and the information doesn’t get put in. What to do?

Macos sonoma autofill
Now you can autofill your passwords anywhere.

In a very clever move, Apple has introduced essentially a manual mode for AutoFill. You’re no longer dependent on Safari recognizing that, yes, these are fields where you can put your address in. Instead, anywhere that you can enter text—and not just in Safari, but anywhere, in any app—bring up the contextual menu by right/two-finger/control clicking on the Mac or tapping and holding on iOS/iPadOS, and then go to the new AutoFill submenu. From there choose Contact or Passwords, depending on what info you want to bring up, and you can have it drop that info right into the form.

If you choose Passwords, you’ll get a window asking you to authenticate with biometrics or your password/passcode; once you do, you’ll have access to all your passwords in a searchable list. (And the system will offer up the one it thinks you want at the top.) Select any credential and it’ll be automatically filled into the text field for you. This works not just with your password, but with your username or two-factor code.1

iOS 17 autofill

This has been a lifesaver for me on sites (and in apps) where the password field isn’t correctly recognized. Instead of having to regularly go to the Passwords section of Settings/System Settings, find the password, copy it, switch back to the app and paste it, I can access that all from within the app.

Even better, because it works anywhere on the system, it means that in my secondary browser on the Mac (Chrome), where I don’t save my credentials, I can now easily access all my passwords.

The fact that this works on iOS and iPadOS is even better; at least on the Mac it’s only a minor pain to switch back and forth between apps; on iOS, it’s a far more laborious process.

What I appreciate most of all about this feature is the self-awareness behind it. It’s essentially Apple admitting that sometimes its technology doesn’t know best, and puts the power back in the hands of users—and in doing so, it makes a great feature even better. Frankly, that’s an approach I’d like to see the company take in more places.


  1. I don’t believe it works with passkeys, as they are not text that you can just fill in. 

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


By John Moltz

This Week in Apple: Non-starting lineups

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

From the land of Magical Thinking comes the windowless Apple car! This from a company that can’t even keep its pencils straight. And how did Tim Cook look at the iPad lineup over the last year and say “Hmm. Needs more iPads.”?

The eyes of all our cars

From the “Sure, why not?” files comes this new Apple patent filing, hopefully never arriving on a street near you.

“Vision Pro could let you see out of an Apple Car with no windows”

What? Could? Go? Wrong?

A number of years back we were told that there was no reason to store all our stuff on a hard drive, just put it in the cloud and you can have it all the time from any device! Clearly the people pushing this idea never went to a secluded beach or mountain cabin and also never thought about what happens when it doesn’t work as designed.

Even when things do work as designed, that doesn’t mean you can’t have problems. True story: mere moments ago I sat down with my iPhone in my pocket playing music to my AirPods. Somehow my leg applied pressure to the VOLUME UP BUTTON ON MY IPHONE MAKING THE MUSIC QUITE LOUD I ASSURE YOU.

That is an example of a device doing exactly what it was supposed to do — turn up the volume when the volume up button is pressed — yet delivering a completely undesirable outcome. So let me just suggest that cars without windows are almost certainly a bad idea even if they work as designed.

Not to worry, though. The best part of this patented design is your giant simulated eyes splashed across the windshield that let pedestrians and other drivers know you’re fully awake and paying attention to the road.

OK, I may have made that up, but… do we really know for sure?

Apple patents lots of things that never see the light of day. Here’s hoping this is one of them.

Pencil time

Have you heard about this stupid pencil Apple released this week? Everyone is really angry about it.

Yes, despite expectations to the contrary, Apple declined to introduce new iPads this week, sticking a Pencil in the eye of the rumor mill instead of a finger. The new Pencil, jauntily dubbed “Apple Pencil (USB-C)”, came with a chart to clear up any confusion about the muddled mess of Pencil features Apple currently offers.

Reaction to the Pencil was pretty harsh. Tapbots’ Paul Haddad quipped:

If you see a stylus chart, they blew it.

This, of course, is a riff on the famous Steve Jobs line from 2010 about the iPad’s competitors that goes “I came here to chew gum and denigrate our competitors and I’m all out of gum.”l

OK, this Pencil doesn’t make a lot of sense now, but I think it will in the future. Apple is phasing out the Lightning connector so it will soon get rid of the 1st generation Apple Pencil and this new one will take its place at the bottom of the lineup at a more reasonable price. When compared to the 1st generation Pencil, Apple gave the new Pencil magnetic attachment and the hover feature on the iPad Pro and took away pressure sensitivity. This makes more sense for general users, as pressure sensitivity is more important for artistic uses, and most people couldn’t draw their way out of a box.

As the base Pencil, this is a better option, the right set of features for most users and no caps to lose. Does the whole lineup currently make sense? Noooo. It’s as if Apple designs lineups outside of the linear progression of time. Possibly if we were to fold time and space into a 12-dimensional hypercube, it would become clear to us. Maybe there’s a Vision Pro app for that.

The iPad SKUs will proliferate until morale improves

Speaking of iPads that Apple didn’t introduce this week, the rumor mill is still chockablock with upcoming entrants to the iPad lineup (motto: “If you think the Pencil lineup is confusing, you’re going to hate this lineup.”).

“Apple Working on Larger iPad Air With 12.9-Inch Display”

Not to go all Gene Munster (never go full Gene Munster) but I’ve always thought the once-rumored Apple television should actually be a big iPad. While the iPad can be used as a creative device, probably a lot more people just use it for watching their stories.

But that’s not the oddest iPad rumored to be currently running through the Rube Goldberg machine of Apple design!

“Foldable iPad Now in ‘Intensive Development,’ Could Be Announced as Soon as Next Year”

[DEVELOPMENT INTENSIFIES]

“Next year”?! Wow. OK. OK, rumor mill. I mean, I don’t believe that, but OK.

So, with no new iPads having been introduced in 2023, a new iPad Air and iPad mini expected soon, and two new waaacky iPad rumors, 2024 could be the year of the iPad.

On the desktop? Could be. Depends on where you put yours. Seems like a lap is more likely.

[John Moltz is a Six Colors contributor. You can find him on Mastodon at Mastodon.social/@moltz and he sells items with references you might get on Cotton Bureau.]


Pencils, iPads, and Balloons

These iPad moves are causing confusion and delay. (Special guest Stephen Hackett fills in for Dan.)


Netflix (which is still top dog) reports results and makes price hikes. Also: Disney+’s value proposition, the complexity of selling ads for streaming, Marvel discovers TV, and your letters.


By Dan Moren for Macworld

Apple has an iCloud problem

If the bricks of Apple’s business are its hardware and software products—iPhones, iPads, Macs, and the software that runs them—then the mortar that holds them together is composed of the company’s services, the chief ingredient of which is iCloud.

That mortar, however, has been eroding for some time—which is one reason you don’t typically hold bricks together with clouds; there are serious structural concerns. While the company has tried to up the value proposition of the service in recent years by introducing new paid features under the moniker of “iCloud+”, it’s the basic, free to all features that are desperately in need of some tender ministrations.

Continue reading on Macworld ↦


By Jason Snell

Inadvertent balloon drops (or, the default conundrum)

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

Myke Hurley drops some balloons (on purpose, this time).

When Apple shipped iOS 17 and macOS Sonoma, it introduced a slew of new video features, all based on intercepting video input and running it through a machine-learning pipeline that detects the subject and the background. The result is that apps on Apple’s platforms don’t need to be updated to take advantage of system-wide settings to blur the background and increase contrast between the subject and the background, both of which have the net effect of making your videoconference image look better. (Apple also uses those features to do some fun things with screen sharing.)

But when you’re analyzing every frame of every bit of video input on the system, you might as well have fun with it, right? So Apple decided to inject a little whimsy and use its machine-learning pipeline to detect some specific gestures and use them as triggers to render animations. The result: if you give two thumbs up in a video, by default your video will be altered to make it appear that you’re in the middle of a sudden fireworks show.

I get why this reaction feature is turned on by default. Features not turned on by default are… basically never turned on. If you want users to use a feature, turn it on. However, this is the result of that decision, as described by Matt Haughey on Mastodon:

A friend was in an online therapy session, describing his trauma so the therapist asked if he was alright and he did a thumbs up and then HUGE FIREWORKS BEHIND HIS HEAD.

It’s so bad that online therapy sessions now start with a warning dialog!


My podcast pal Myke Hurley reports that this happened in his online therapy session, too—except it wasn’t inappropriate fireworks, it was an inappropriate release of balloons.

The logical response to an inadvertent animation trigger is embarrassment—after all, you are on a live video call with someone when it happens! But after that, the second most logical response is to figure out how to turn it off. And here, we run into another challenge: any search of the interface of the app you’re using will turn up no trace of this feature, because it’s being done at a system level. Apple has decided to put all its camera controls under the blue camera icon that appears in the Menu Bar when a camera is active.

This is a tough question. If Apple has invested all this effort in building a new feature that it thinks is fun and that people will like, why turn it off by default? (Sad ironic fireworks in an online therapy session is why.)

Your operating system could trigger a more detailed warning about this new feature the first time you use a webcam on the new operating system. (I’m pretty sure it does—at least in macOS Sonoma?) The problem is, if you’re launching an app that’s using a webcam, in that moment you are probably trying to get to your meeting or therapy session or D&D game, and let’s face it, you’re probably running late. You will click OK or Continue on any window that gets in your way, probably without reading it. (Especially if you recently upgraded and are tired of all the alert windows.)

So what’s the alternative? Here’s the best thing I’ve come up with: The operating system should wait until after a session involving the webcam has ended, and then use one of its fancy new discoverability features to offer to walk the user through ways to improve their video systemwide, including the use of fun animated reactions. And if they aren’t willing to listen just then, come back and get them some other time when they’re in a better mood.

There’s no great answer here. For every Haughey or Hurley who is interrupted by inappropriate animations, there’s probably someone else who discovers the feature in a family call and thinks they’re delightful. But in a case like this, where embarrassment in front of other people is a strong possibility, I feel like our devices should probably ask permission rather than forgiveness.



Underrated Apple apps, our reading setups, feelings on the Apple Pencil, and our thoughts on onboarding processes.


Take Control of Photos version 3.3 released

My book about Apple’s Photos app has been updated for macOS Sonoma, iOS 17, and iPadOS 17.

Among the new items covered are photo stickers, the upgraded People & Pets albums, Apple Watch changes, custom iPad lock screen features, new Photos widgets, and the new features introduced in the iPhone 15 models.

This should be a free update for anyone who previously bought the third edition; for everyone else, it’s $14.99 for 208 pages!


By Jason Snell

The price of Apple’s old-products strategy

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

It’s an entirely innocuous announcement that says so much.

Tuesday’s reveal of a new Apple Pencil that’s got a USB-C port and lacks numerous features of both the first- and second-generation Apple Pencils sure seems like minor stuff.

Think about it for a moment, though: This is a product that, at least in part, addresses one of the most baffling features of the 10th-generation iPad: support only for the first-generation Pencil via a rickety Lightning-to-USB dongle. This seems to be the Apple Pencil that should’ve been shipped a year ago for that iPad. Why did it have to wait a year?

After that, though, one might start interrogating the structure of the entire iPad product line, but don’t poke a stick in there—you might get a face full of bees. It feels like the iPad product line isn’t quite coherent, but the mess at the low end is the consequence of Apple’s Tim Cook-era strategy to keep old products around to hit specific price points.

There was a time when Apple didn’t let old products linger. Last year’s model was discontinued and replaced by this year’s. But Cook and his team have taken to heart the fact that the longer a product is in production, the cheaper it is to make—and therefore, keeping old products around is one way to lower prices and reach markets for whom Apple products are otherwise too pricey.

This strategy has a lot of advantages, but it does create clutter when you’re shopping for an Apple product. While you would think that Tuesday’s announcement of the USB-C Apple Pencil would mean that Apple can finally send the original Pencil to the cornfield, it doesn’t—because Apple still sells the ninth-generation iPad, which has Lightning and therefore can only use the first-generation Apple Pencil.

The ninth-generation iPad still exists not despite the 10th-generation model being superior in every way but because of it. The newer iPad has great specs, but as a result, Apple has priced it at $449 ($419 in education). The 9th-generation iPad starts at $329 ($309 in education). Apple has kept the old model around because it knows some (most?) schools would balk at the price of the newer model. (It’s probably also the case that schools that have invested in old iPad hardware would prefer to keep using a model that doesn’t break compatibility with their investments.)

It’s the same reason that the $1299 13-inch MacBook Pro exists. It’s a “new” product, but full of old tech, and it makes the MacBook Pro line confusing… but Apple knows that some corporate buyers just won’t buy a non-pro laptop, and yet the $1999 14-inch model is just too rich for their blood.

Tim Cook’s Apple has foregone simplicity in its product lines, when necessary, in order to ensure that it doesn’t lose sales. Now, I could argue that the right thing to do was release the 10th-generation iPad at a lower price and take the hit on profit margin in the short term, but there’s a reason Apple is one of the world’s most profitable companies, and it doesn’t involve taking hits on margin. I could also argue that if the 10th-generation iPad was meant for the low-end market but couldn’t be priced to reach it, then it wasn’t designed right.

But by keeping old products around, Apple is also free to release updated products more often. If Apple had determined that it couldn’t sell the 10th-generation iPad at a price its education customers would pay, it could’ve just… not released the product. Instead, we’ve got a messy product line with two low-end iPads in it, but at least people who want to buy a more modern iPad can do so. And when the new Apple Pencil ships in November, they can even use it without a janky adapter.

Still, it’s hard to look at the shenanigans in the iPad product line over the last few years and not get the sense that things are kind of a mess. This new Pencil should’ve shipped last year with the 10th-generation iPad. The new iPad has features that higher-end models don’t. There’s insufficient differentiation between the iPad Air and the iPad Pro. (Leaving old models aside, it just feels like there are too many iPads, doesn’t it?)

It’s possible that we’re witnessing a reset, however. There hasn’t been a single new iPad announcement this year, and given Tuesday’s Apple Pencil announcement, it sure feels like there won’t be one. Perhaps 2024 will bring us a new wave of iPads that will finally make the product line make more sense. But don’t get your hopes up too much: Apple will probably still keep selling some old models, too. It’s what today’s Apple does.


By Dan Moren

Apple announces new Apple Pencil with magnetic storage and USB-C port

Note: This story has not been updated since 2023.

Apple Pencil with USB-C

There may not be new iPads, but if you’re in the market for an Apple Pencil, well, it’s your lucky day. Apple took the wraps off its new stylus, the most affordable model yet, which replaces the Lightning port with a USB-C option.

This pencil is clearly designed for use with the tenth-generation iPad: while it attaches magnetically to the long edge of the iPad for storage, it still charges via a physical port. Unlike the old Lightning model, which had a removable (and easily lost) cap hiding its charging and pairing connector, the new Apple Pencil features an innovative sliding design that reveals a USB-C port into which you can plug a cable (which, naturally, is not included). Its design is otherwise very similar to the second-generation Pencil.

At $79, this Pencil is cheaper than both the first-generation model at $99 and the second-generation model at $129. But that’s because it doesn’t have all the features of either of them: it lacks the pressure sensitivity of either of the previous models, as well as the double-tap controls, wireless pairing and charging, and free engraving of the second-generation. However, the new Pencil does support the “hover” feature on M2 iPad Pro models.

Apple’s very clear about not calling this the “third-generation” Apple Pencil, rather pitching it as part of a more complete Apple Pencil lineup. The new model works with any iPad equipped with a USB-C port. It also appears that though rumors suggested a new Apple Pencil might use a magnetic system for attaching replacement tips, that this version uses the same tips as previous models.

Education customers can get the new Pencil at a mild discount of $69. Apple’s also offering a $9 USB-C to Apple Pencil Adapter for owners of the first-generation model who want to keep using it.

The new Apple Pencil will be available starting in early November.

[Dan Moren is the East Coast Bureau Chief of Six Colors, as well as an author, podcaster, and two-time Jeopardy! champion. You can find him on Mastodon at @dmoren@zeppelin.flights or reach him by email at dan@sixcolors.com. His next novel, the sci-fi adventure Eternity's Tomb, will be released in November 2026.]


Will Apple introduce new iPads this month? A new Apple Pencil? Nothing at all? We grapple with some conflicting rumors. Also, Jason gives up on the iPad-only lifestyle and reviews a supremely weird E-Ink device (that he actually kind of likes).


By John Moltz

This Week in Apple: Big business bucks

John Moltz and his conspiracy board. Art by Shafer Brown.

This week Piper Sandler takes on the most harrowing task of all while Google makes it rain on Cupertino. And if you’re waiting to buy the latest Apple kit this year, your wait will soon be over.

The scariest time of year

Say, how are the kids these days? Has anyone checked on them? Are the kids… all right?

“iPhone Continues to Be Most Popular Smartphone Among Teens, Apple Watch Ownership Growing”

Well, I kind of meant more emotionally. But I guess that works, too. It’s certainly more pertinent to this column.

This is, of course, Piper Sandler’s annual survey of teens across America, and hats off to them for doing this every year because teens are frightening. You ever see a group of them at the mall?

[shudder]

And, as the report notes, they’ve been doing this a long time.

Since the project began in 2001, Piper Sandler has surveyed more than 248,283 teens and collected over 60.7 million data points on teen spending.

That’s a lot of teens. But it still might only be a certain subset. Ten years ago, Apple Insider noted that Piper was only surveying teens in upper and middle income brackets. It’s not clear if it’s continued that practice or not, so while these results might be indicative of the purchasing patterns of better-heeled teens they may not speak for all teens.

Do teens like iPhones and Apple Watches? Sure. Do 87 percent of all teens in the U.S. own an iPhone as the survey claims? That’s less certain.

Pay to play

It has previously been suggested that Google paid Apple somewhere in the neighborhood of $10 billion to be the default search engine on iOS. Well, apparently inflation has gotten a lot worse than we thought.

“Google Pays Apple $18B to $20B a Year to Be Default iOS Search Engine”

I was gonna say it’s good work if you can get it, but I’m not sure how much work is really involved. Certainly there are a lot of lawyers involved. I’m just not sure how much coding.

Bernstein says Google pays out 22 percent of total ad revenue under its traffic acquisition costs (TAC) and estimates Apple likely receives around 40 percent of this.

Hey, look, iOS developers! It could be worse!

Eddy Cue has defended continuing to make Google the default search engine by saying there’s no “valid alternative”. As a DuckDuckGo user, I’d take exception to that assertion. In Cue’s defense, though, he might just be saying there’s no valid alternative to getting $18-20 billion a year. I get that.

Very sane Apple rumors

We are about halfway through October and time is running out for any additional Apple hardware this year. Current rumors indicate those M3-based MacBooks we were hoping to get won’t ship until next year. Please adjust your scorecards accordingly.

Now at the tenth hour a new rumor suggests…

Wait, is it a rumor when it’s based on extended ship dates for Macs? Is reading portents rightly categorized in “rumors” or should it be considered “speculation” or “conjecture”?

Are there any etymologists in the audience?

I said “etymologists”, Karl. No one wants to hear about your fish degree right now.

At any rate, as MacOtakara noticed, ship dates for iMacs have been delayed, indicating that a refresh could be coming, possibly the long-awaited bump to an M2 processor. Usually the darling of Apple’s lineup, the iMac has now fallen behind the once-lowly Mac mini in the refresh cycle (the last mini refresh took 26 months while the current iMac has been out for a whopping 30 months).

There’s still a fair chance that Apple will rev the iPad Air this month, but all other rumors, portents, signs and bones cast indicate we’re done for the year for everything else.

Unless you have $21 billion. In which case Apple might also be willing to sell you a previously unavailable spot as a search engine.

[John Moltz is a Six Colors contributor. You can find him on Mastodon at Mastodon.social/@moltz and he sells items with references you might get on Cotton Bureau.]



Search Six Colors